Radiology Credentialing Service: Timeline and Costs

Radiology Credentialing Service for Imaging Teams

Share:

Table of Contents

Expert Radiology Credentialing Service for Imaging Practices

Your new radiologist is ready to read, but the payer is still showing them with their former group. Or your reading group is getting paid while the claims from the new MRI site are getting kicked back. Our Radiology Credentialing Service helps Imaging teams across the U.S. with application enrollment and follow ups, and provides the information needed for billing to release claims.

We help radiology practices, freestanding Imaging centers, Hospital Radiology Departments and Teleradiology Groups. A project can be for a new hire, new site, backlog applications or ongoing renewals. We come to agreement on the providers, payers and locations in scope and your team knows what work we’ll do, and what decisions they’ll need to make.

A Radiology credentialing service aids radiologists, groups and Imaging facilities to prepare qualification records, complete payer enrollment applications, coordinate applicable licenses and privileges and verify participation before claims are released. The service could cover recredentialing, Medicare revalidation and any practice or group change.

What our radiology credentialing service covers

Credentialing ensures that the practitioner’s qualifications, licensing, professional history, and clinical privileges are in order. The organization’s network status and prior billing information are ensured through payer enrollment and contracting. The next step involves the entry by the payer of the authorized provider, group, and location in the claims system. This is often coordinated by the Medical Billing Services.

Payer Enrollment, CAQH, NPI, and Group Linkage

We can enroll providers in Original Medicare through PECOS and assist with applications to state Medicaid, managed care, and commercial payer programs. An insurer can administer a commercial PPO, an exchange plan, and a Medicare Advantage plan, and each product may have different participation agreements. We confirm each product in scope with the groupโ€™s tax ID and the sites that will submit claims.

We assist with the CAQH Provider Data Portal and ensure participating organizations have access as needed. We also facilitate attestation with the clinician. CAQH members can use this information in their credentialing. Each payerโ€™s processes, contracts, and roster requirements are separate. With CAQH, begin with the most accurate provider information and assess the sites and services that need to be added for each plan.

We reconcile the individual Type 1 National Provider Identifier (NPI) of the radiologist, the Type 2 NPI of the organization, if any, the billing TIN, Specialty taxonomy codes, and approved locations. CMS, via PECOS, uses the electronic version of the CMS-855I for individual physician enrollment and reassignment. Group practices and other suppliers use the paper version, CMS-855B, for their own enrollment. A radiologist already enrolled with CMS may need reassignment to a different group. Similar to CMS, some commercial plans use a Roster Add or an Affiliation Request to effect a similar operational change.

State Licensing, DEA Registration, and Hospital Privileges

When in scope, we are able to complete state medical license applications, gather supporting documents, and manage requests and renewals. For remote readers, confirm the state rules that apply to the location where the patient receives care, and review the reading location for additional requirements. The state licensing board makes the final determination for licensure, and the physician provides the required signatures and attestations.

We are also able to track the DEA and state controlled-substance credentials where applicable. Confirm the role and state and facility requirements where applicable. An interventional radiologistโ€™s responsibilities with respect to controlled substances may differ from a physician whose role is limited to remote diagnostic interpretation.

Hospital privileging provides an opportunity for forms, references, case log reviews, and follow-up with the Medical Staff Office. Required documentation for approval of diagnostic reads and image-guided procedures varies between hospitals. The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) publishes credentialing standards that guide verification of the practitionerโ€™s qualifications. The Joint Commission provides guidance on hospital credentialing and privileging. The organization reviewing the file applies its own requirements and makes the approval decision.

Recredentialing, Medicare Revalidation, and Rosters

Recredentialing is a periodic review of a practitionerโ€™s or supplierโ€™s qualifications to practice by a payer or facility. Medicare revalidation is the affirmation by CMS of a provider or supplierโ€™s record to verify that it is current. Keep distinct tasks for CAQH reattestation, license and malpractice renewals, facility reappointment, Medicare revalidation, and applicable imaging accreditation or certification. Assign an owner and a source for each taskโ€™s due date.

Maintaining your roster requires changes due to departures, ownership and billing entity changes, new sites, and adjustments to a clinicianโ€™s scope of practice. When a reader leaves, there may still be work in the billing queue after that individual is removed from the schedule. Itโ€™s important to track the last covered service date, the payerโ€™s roster change, and the outstanding claims to assist the billing team with reconciling all of the data.

Records your practice receives

You should expect a radiology credentialing service to leave your staff with records they can use. You should define a deliverable for each file as a submission receipt, an open-items report, or a handoff note and approval to bill. A payer application may have multiple outstanding requests. The report should identify which request is pending and who can resolve it.

To begin clearing a backlog, find out what applications are pending. Request the payerโ€™s reference number, the date and description of the most recent request made, the contact person, and the due date for the response. An expired signature on an active application should be handled in a different manner than an application that was closed and is in need of refiling. The right follow up can also assist with preserving billing history

Imaging Billing Determines Enrollment

Imaging billing ultimately determines enrollment. The same diagnostic study can have a professional and technical component. Where code, setting, and payer permit component billing, modifier 26 identifies the professional component and the technical component is claimed separately. A global claim joins both components in a single claim where the billing entity is eligible to report both. The credentialing file should reflect actual billing arrangement.

Reading Groups and Hospital Departments

If a hospital performs a study and an independent group bills the interpretation, the hospital follows its facility billing arrangement and the reading group verifies the radiologistโ€™s relationship to its own billing entity. For a new reader, confirm the hospitalโ€™s granted privileges, the groupโ€™s payer arrangement and the applicable individual reassignment.

A hospital can clear a radiologist to read CT while the payer is still processing the physicianโ€™s addition to a contracted group. In this case, the practice manager needs to be clear to bill and collect for the service. The hospitalโ€™s medical staff office grants the privilege to read CT. The payer grants participation.

Freestanding Imaging Centers and IDTFs

Some imaging suppliers enroll as an Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility (IDTF). The right enrollment route depends on the entityโ€™s operation and billing practices. Verify the supplier type with the MAC. If IDTF rules apply, provide the location and equipment information, and the name of the supervising personnel and technologist, and plan for a potential site survey.

Review the technical-component accreditation for the appropriate modality (e.g. CT, MRI, nuclear medicine, etc.) for the location being supplied. The organizations recognized by CMS for advanced diagnostic imaging accreditation include the ACR and The Joint Commission. Mammography has its own facility certification and personnel qualifications under the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA). If your center is adding breast imaging, review the facility certificate and the qualifications of the interpreting physician during the launch.

Example. A freestanding center opens a second MRI suite, and its independent reading group submits the interpretation claim and gets paid. However, the centerโ€™s technical claim for the MRI service is denied. First, examine the entity and address on the technical claim and compare them to the suppliersโ€™ approved enrollment, accreditation, and the payerโ€™s site record. If only one site is recorded, document the missing site, route the correction to the enrollment team, and decide which service dates the payer will accept. Then, billing can edit the affected claims.

Teleradiology groups and Interventional radiologists

Remote Radiology Medical Credentialing Services should retain a clear record indicating which readers are approved at which hospitals, payers and locations. If the credentialing team can confirm the physician has a recognized state license, approved hospital privileges and scope of service, and reporting responsibilities, the team may consider using credentialing by proxy, provided the team verifies a written agreement exists and oversight of the physician meets the applicable requirements. Payer enrollment and group affiliation follow a separate process.

Scheduling and IT teams must also have the updated credentialing information. A teleradiologist may have access to the PACS of a hospital where credentialing for that hospital is still pending. The worklist should include only the site and the procedures the physician is authorized to read. For Interventional Radiology, confirmation of the approved procedures and the billing location for those services must be verified.

A remote reader may already cover one community hospital, and then cover a second hospital for weekend calls. The second hospital may rely on the distant site’s credentialing under a qualifying agreement, but it must also approve the physician’s privileges. Medical Credentialing Services can assist with the review of the physician’s license, the scope of service, IT worklist, payer affiliation and approval for coverage. The approval granted by the first hospital is not transferable to the second hospital.

The credentialing process, from intake to billing

  • Determine what will be billed. List the radiologists, legal entities, payer products, sites, and components of each claim. Flag new enrollments, additions to existing groups, new facility sites, and work owned by the hospital.
  • Obtain supporting documents. Request the most recent copies of state licenses, specialty training and board information, malpractice information, work history, and references. For organizational applications, request Articles of Incorporation, tax information, physical address and site information, and accreditation records. Use a secure channel to transmit documents containing sensitive identifiers.
  • After reconciliation of the source records,ย compare the applicant information to NPPES, CAQH profile, PECOS, payer files, and billing setup. Address differences that affect the application. A correspondence address and a service address may legitimately differ, and in that case, the type of address should be annotated.
  • Complete and submit the appropriate forms and follow-up on them. Work on eligible payer, facility, and hospital files concurrently, if the prerequisites allow. Obtain receipts or case numbers for all submissions. Assign a named owner and deadline for each request for additional information.
  • Check the approved scope. Obtain evidence of payer system loading, approval or contract notice, and effective date. Retain any communication from the contractor. For Medicare, also retain the contractorโ€™s enrollment or reassignment confirmation.
  • Forward the approved records to billing and supporting evidence. Release claim segments that have been approved and maintain a hold queue for unapproved segments. Check the initial remittance advices (if available) for reasons the claim was denied.
  • Assign a primary and backup owner for renewal of the approved records. Retain the application history and proof of activation. This allows the practice to reconstruct the history if a denial review is initiated.

A good status entry would look like:

Commercial PPO | Reader A | Group A | Site 1 | professional interpretation | confirmed participation from the payer’s effective date | Site 2 pending.ย Store the payer’s written confirmation or the portal record with the entry. If a representative confirms loading by phone, note the confirmation number and request written confirmation in the future. A directory listing may help clarify a discrepancy. Billing needs documentation that supports the product, claim unit, and relevant service time.

Compare eligible claims in your billing system with approved claims in your billing system with approved claims on your first batch. Review rendering and billing identifiers, location reported on the claim, and payer product selected. Acceptance by the clearinghouse only indicates that the claim was accepted by the clearinghouse for transmission. The first payer remittance gives you an opportunity to identify an unexpected out-of-network payment or a missing provider record before the same happens to a larger batch.

Review your enrollment prior to submitting claims

Communicate the number of providers, imaging locations, and payers. The Resilient MBS team can assist you in determining which documents should be prioritized and which approvals are outstanding.

Timelines and Supporting Evidence

Approximately 90-120 days lead time is reasonable for a multi-payer project. Plan around this estimate. Fewer steps may be required for an existing group adding a reader to a complete file. Additional facilities, sites, or state licenses may extend the work.

Track separate milestones at intake for a complete submission, decision, and activation in the applicable system. For the hospital file, determine the next review cycle and what evidence they need to place the application on the agenda. For state licensing, find the boardโ€™s current processing time and any prerequisites. For a facility, schedule around payer review, accreditation and inspection.

The numbers vary for contract loading time. For the facility credentialing process with UnitedHealthcare (UHC) for example, UHC medical provider guidance states it takes approximately 45 calendar days or more from the time it receives a complete file. Loading of the contract is advised to take up to 60 days from the time the contract is approved and the signed contract is received. Use the relevant productโ€™s guidance for your situation. The process for adding a product to an existing contract may be different from adding a product for a new contract.

For a planned launch, prioritize things that are blocking. If the reader has group and access privileges for two products and a third is pending, give instructions on how to schedule and bill for those products. If the third pending item is a required license or clinical privilege, the medical staff office or compliance is best suited to determine what assignments can proceed. If the hospital is considering granting temporary privileges to cover a gap, then the hospitalโ€™s bylaws and the relevant standards govern. Verify billing separately for the coverage.

Claims Before Activation

A claim can be pending while the sponsor records are loaded. A claim can also be outside the payerโ€™s effective period. The first situation means the system is not yet ready to accept eligible claims and there is nothing you can do but hold the claim. For the second, contact the payer and ask if they have a rule to pay for an earlier date of service. If so, record the deadline for timely filing and the payerโ€™s instructions for the claims. Work with your billing and compliance leads if the deadline for timely filing or a patientโ€™s balance is at risk.

If the conditions for retrospective billing are met for Original Medicare or a Part B supplier, then billing can occur after the service was provided. This is not allowed for all IDTFs. Contact the MAC to understand how to bill for a specific location. Also check with commercial and Medicaid plans separately. Document why a claim is being held, your next follow-up, and who can authorize release of the claim.

Mistakes that Turn Approvals Into Denials

Readers being assigned to the wrong group is a common occurrence when a radiologist changes practices or works with multiple billing groups. Routing claims to the rendering NPI, along with the billing NPI and tax ID, resolves the issue with the payer. Confirm the physicianโ€™s group and product affiliation with the payer. If a roster addition was missed, amend the roster, and then follow the payerโ€™s direction for claims that were affected.

Before a payer updates its location file, itโ€™s not uncommon to receive denials when adding a new site to the schedule. Find out if the payer requires a site-specific application, contract update, or accreditation record. Denial management can be used to highlight denials for one specific address or modality. Review all claims for specific denials or reach out to denial management to assist with site-specific denials.

Often times, one payer product approval doesnโ€™t extend to other products offered by the same payer. Look at the name of the payer listed on the approval notice and compare it to the name of the payer product listed on the memberโ€™s plan. Record the result at the product level for scheduling and billing.

If a payer development request is ignored, a complete application could be sent back for additional information. This can occur due to missing peer references, expired malpractice coverage, or unexplained employment gaps. Monitor the payer portal and the mailbox assigned to the case after submission. Make a separate list of files that are waiting on your team and a separate list of files that are waiting for payer review.

The status of the ordering providerโ€™s enrollment can also impact the adjudication of an imaging claim. If several denials of Original Medicare claims are centered around a single referring office, check the name and NPI of the ordering provider as well as the enrollment record to see if it is time-limited. A consistent pattern of denials tied to a single referring provider suggests that the ordering record is the problem, while several denials limited to a single radiologist or facility may be a group or facility enrollment issue.

After the payer confirms a correction, decide whether the claim will be reprocessed, if a corrected submission will be accepted, or if an appeal will be required. Review patient balances prior to the generation of accounts receivable to ensure appropriate balances. Correcting a credentialing record resolves neither coverage nor authorization issues. If an MRI authorization was granted for a particular site and service, ensure the approved service and site match the service and site for which the MRI was performed.

The same review may show the issue is outside credentialing. If the payer confirms the group link and the remittance is not received, determine to which electronic remittance address the payment was routed. If EFT payment files show payment while the remittance advices deny payment, isolate and examine the claims processing work queues. Keeping these records in order helps the Denial Management team address the underlying cause and not resubmit claims blindly.

Pricing and choosing a radiology credentialing service

When negotiating pricing for a credentialing service, an organization should understand how the vendor prices its services. Generally, vendors bill one of three ways: per provider and payer product, per facility application, or as a retainer. Vendors may consider facilities, applications, projects, roster corrections, contract loading checks, recredentialing, and/or applications with state licensing, accreditation, and/or applicable agencies as separate units. A vendor may provide follow-up services for application status, roster corrections, and contract loading checks. Vendors may also include ongoing services as part of their retainer fee. A vendor may include ancillary enrollment services in its proposal. If a vendor includes all the above in its proposal, ask for an itemized list, showing what services the vendor includes in its retainer and services provided. Be sure to review state licensing, accreditation, and applicable agency fees for separate line items.

When requesting proposals from multiple vendors, consider a scenario for two radiologists joining a group across four products, plus a new imaging location. You will have eight combinations to verify: four product-radiologist combos, two new product-imaging location combos, and two new product-imaging location combos. Some of the products may need a full application, while the others may just be roster updates. The imaging location may require a new supplier enrollment. Send the same roster to each vendor for pricing. Ask for proposals for full applications and updates, facility files and maintenance. Consider the vendor that offers the lowest price for the most deliverables.

When reviewing proposals, look for who prepares applications, signs applications, follows up on applications and what is included when a file closes. What services does the vendor offer as part of the retainer? Ask for sample billing handoff and a copy of a status report. For a teleradiology arrangement, a vendor should be able to provide an example of how it would track a hospital in a state that permits credentialing by proxy and a hospital in a state that requires a review by the vendor. The example should also include a payer-specific state license check and example services the vendor would provide.

Agree who retains application receipts, payer correspondence, and approval notices, as well as who controls access to the portal, if the engagement ends. The practice should be allowed to retrieve its records and take over the work in progress. Understand what the vendor does with sensitive documents, and with whom does it share those documents. For proposals that include billing work, review the terms for the credentialing project and the billing engagement, and determine what is included.

When evaluating two proposals for a radiology credentialing service, require the same reporting milestones. Measure the vendorโ€™s work based on the time it takes to complete an intake and submit a file. Measure the work done by the payer or facility based on the time from submission to approval. The last measure of work is based on the time from approval to verified billing handoff. Ask how the vendor handles incomplete applications and what files are excluded from turnaround time reporting. In a backlog engagement, a good report also shows which files are blocked from being processed due to an unavailable payer, closed network, or missing document.

In-house versus outsourced radiology credentialing

Factor In-house team Outsourced support
Best fit A stable roster, few payer products, and a coordinator with reliable backup. A group adding readers or sites, working across states, or carrying an application backlog.
Cost Staff time, software, training, and coverage when the coordinator is away. Application or project fees, optional maintenance, and any charges for work outside scope.
Control Direct access to internal stakeholders and practice records. Practice approval of the scope and signatures, with application work and follow-up assigned to the vendor.
Evidence to review A shared roster, follow-up schedule, and written billing signoff. A status report with file owners, open requests, effective dates, and proof of activation.
Common handoff Credentialing informs scheduling, compliance, and billing when each record is ready. Vendor sends the approval evidence. The practice confirms its own clinical and claim-release controls.

You can also outsource a defined piece of work. A hospital-based group might keep privileging with its medical staff office, use a radiology credentialing service for payer applications and roster cleanup, and have its billing lead approve releases. That model works when each pending item has an owner and all three teams can see the status.

Radiology Credentialing Quote Request

We need your help providing details on the providers, facilities, and payer products that you will be adding or updating. This will give us a basis to provide you with a quote.

Radiology credentialing FAQs

How long does radiology credentialing take?

Use 90 to 120 days as a planning allowance when several payer products or facilities are involved. The actual timeline depends on the completeness of the file, applicable licensing and facility steps, payer review, and when the approved record is loaded.

Which documents should a radiologist have ready?

Start with a current CV, state licenses, training and board records, malpractice coverage and claims history, and the individual NPI. The payer or hospital may also request references, a CAQH profile, procedure logs, or DEA and state controlled-substance documentation where applicable.

Can a radiologist bill while payer enrollment is pending?

Hold in-network claims until you can verify the payerโ€™s approved effective date, group and location linkage, and any applicable earlier billing terms. If services have already been provided, track filing deadlines and get written instructions on which claims the payer will accept.

Can one radiology credentialing service enroll the radiologist and the imaging center?

Yes, when the scope covers both. The radiologistโ€™s professional billing relationship and the facilityโ€™s supplier or ancillary enrollment are separate records. A center subject to IDTF, accreditation, or mammography certification requirements needs those items tracked as well.

Does credentialing by proxy cover a teleradiologistโ€™s payer enrollment?

Credentialing by proxy can support hospital privileging under a qualifying written arrangement. Confirm the applicable state license, the hospitalโ€™s approval and scope, and the payer enrollment or group affiliation independently for each relevant arrangement.

What does a radiology credentialing service cost?

Fees vary with the number of radiologists, payer products, locations, and types of application. Request an itemized quote that distinguishes new enrollments, roster changes, facility applications, and maintenance. Ask which external fees and follow-up work the price includes.

Before your next reader or scanner goes live

When you onboard a reader or install a scanner, you begin with the roster that will be used by your billing department. The roster will list the individuals able to bill through the specific entity at a particular site, for a particular payer product. Resilient MBS can help you manage the process and get the necessary approvals.

You May Also Like To Read

1:1 Meeting with our Medical Billing Manager (Free)

Meeting Agenda: How Resilient MBS can improve your Revenue in 3-Quick Steps?

Get in Touch

One More Step To Continue

Get Free Consultaion

EXCELLENT
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Based on 15 reviews
Posted on Google Google
Bonnie Russo profile picture
Bonnie Russo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Resilient Medical Billing Services has been our absolute saving graceโ€”true knights in shining armor! We came from a well-known billing company that left us drowningโ€”five months in and still no credentialing completed, we were overwhelmed, losing money, and even paying money back. It was a nightmare. Then we found Resilient. From day one, their team took charge with professionalism, clarity, and genuine care. They not only cleaned up the mess we were left with, but completed all our new credentialing in record time. Their communication is phenomenalโ€”theyโ€™re responsive, proactive, and always available when we need them. Since working with Resilient, weโ€™ve seen a real shiftโ€”not just in profit, but in peace of mind. We feel seen, heard, and fully supported. Choosing them has been one of the best decisions weโ€™ve made for our business. Highly, highly recommend! Bonnie Russo, LCSW Owner/Operator Papillon Health and Wellness Psychotherapy
Posted on Google Google
Jartu Garway profile picture
Jartu Garway
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I canโ€™t recommend Resilient Medical Billing Services enough! They truly made the process of getting credentialed with Medicaid and some of the top insurance companies in the state fast and smooth. From start to finish, they stayed on top of everything, ensuring there were no delays. Their communication was consistent, keeping me informed throughout the entire process. What sets them apart is their dedication to seeing you succeed. They are incredibly respectful, patient, and thorough when requesting information, always double-checking to ensure everything is correct and in place for approval. Their attention to detail helped eliminate any potential roadblocks during the credentialing process. Another major plus is their pricing structure- there's a one-time charge with no hidden fees,and they do exactly what they say. No Surprises, no fine print,Just reliable Services. I will be recommending them for the rest of my careerโ€”this team knows how to get the job done right and efficiently! MIKE WOOD IS THE BEST I HONESTLY FEEL LIKE HE IS FAMILY INSTEAD OF A BUSINESS AFFILIATION!!!!
Posted on Google Google
lashelle melton profile picture
lashelle melton
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Positive Review for Resilient Credentialing and Billing Company I am thrilled to share my experience with Resilient Credentialing and Billing Company, having partnered with them since May 2024 for Melton Telepsychiatry Services. From the very beginning, their professionalism and dedication to our clinic's needs have been evident. The team at Resilient has made the credentialing process seamless and efficient. They possess a deep understanding of the nuances in our industry, which has significantly alleviated the stress typically associated with credentialing and billing. Their prompt communication and willingness to address any questions have provided us with peace of mind, allowing us to focus more on our patients. Additionally, their billing services are exemplary. They have streamlined our billing processes, ensuring timely reimbursements and maintaining an accurate account of our services. This has had a positive impact on our cash flow and overall operational efficiency. Overall, I highly recommend Resilient for any clinic looking for reliable, knowledgeable, and supportive credentialing and billing services. Their commitment to client success truly sets them apart in the industry. Thank you, Resilient, for your outstanding service! Dr. LaShelle Melton DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, CCHP
Posted on Google Google
Bakary Marong profile picture
Bakary Marong
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Hello Mike Thank you for your credentialing service and I truly appreciate you especially your commitment, respect and professionalism you have shown me during the entire process. I will highly recommend you to anyone who is interested in credentialing services. Mike, it was truly amazing to work with you. Thank you for helping me get credentialed with both Medicare and private insurances. Bakary Marong
Posted on Google Google
Ivanka Acosta profile picture
Ivanka Acosta
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Resilient MBS is the best for all your medical billing service needs! Being a new business owner, I was looking for a company that could help me become in network with certain medical and vision plans. Not only did resilient MBS do that, but they also answered any questions I had about the process and what to expect. The credentialing specialist Mike was great. He was always quick to respond to my emails and would send me frequent updates. I truly recommend Resilient MBS.
Posted on Google Google
Cynthia Madueke profile picture
Cynthia Madueke
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have had a highly positive experience working with the team, particularly Mike. They have provided clear and helpful guidance throughout the credentialing process, addressing all my questions and concerns. I am also looking forward to continuing our collaboration on billing services. The team's expertise and support have been invaluable, and I appreciate their dedication to ensuring a smooth and successful experience.
Posted on Google Google
Kristin Tomczak profile picture
Kristin Tomczak
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with Mike Wood through Resilient BBS LLC is making the credentialing process as smooth as possible! Mike has been communicative about the process each step of the way and is readily available whenever I have a question and/or need clarification.
Posted on Google Google
ReklayMe Health and Wellness profile picture
ReklayMe Health and Wellness
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
They have been very helpful and very patient throughout my credentialing process. It is a great company to work with!
Verified by Trustindex
Trustindex verified that these reviews were published on Resilient Medical Billing Services's Google Business Profile. Learn more

One More Step To View Pricing