D7210 Dental Code 2026: Requirements & Billing

D7210 Dental Code: Surgical Extraction Billing & Documentation Guide

D7210 is used to report the surgical removal of an erupted tooth. Removal of an erupted tooth may require surgical removal of alveolar bone and/or sectioning of the tooth. The code also may be used to report elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap and associated surgery. A surgical extraction is reported with this code if the extraction was complicated. Complications are determined by what surgical techniques were necessary to remove the tooth. Codes in the D series are typically determined by the clinical description and not the time and effort involved by the practitioner.

Distinguishing what techniques were necessary to remove the erupted tooth is important when completing a claim. A description supporting this code is often missing or inadequate. This may result in a claim being denied, downcoded, orrequire additional documentation.

It is important for all staff involved in the business and practice of dentistry to code what is clinically documented. It is not appropriate to code what the staff feels is appropriate based on experience or time involved in providing care.

This document describes the elements of this particular code, similar codes, situations where this code should be used, and what should be documented to support this code. It is important for staff to understand where to place this code to avoid claiming an inappropriate amount.

D7210 at a Glance

D7210 is included in the classification of oral and maxillofacial surgery in the CDT.

The description of this procedure indicates that the code is assignable for the extraction of an erupted tooth through the uncovering of a mucoperiosteal flap when necessary, and the cutting and/or removal of adjacent bone and/or gum, minor smoothening of the extraction socket, removal of tooth structure, and closing flaps and/or gum.

This definition raises a series of questions for the coding professional.

  • Was the tooth erupted at the time of extraction?
  • Were portions of the tooth removed and/or was bone removed to assist in the extraction?
  • Was this noted in the operative report?

If bone was not removed and/or the tooth was not sectioned to assist in the extraction, this code should not be assigned, regardless of how long it took to complete the extraction.

In the description of the clinical situation, the ADA states that the coding professional should assign a code based on his/her best medical judgment.

When D7210 Is the Right Code

Consider D7210 as a code relating to a particular procedure, and not as a level of difficulty.

Appearances can be deceiving on the dental schedule. What appears to be a straightforward extraction may involve a good deal of complication. On the other hand, what may appear to be a complicated extraction on a radiograph, may require little or no work described by D7210.

Bone removal

D7210 may be reported when a surgeon is required to remove bone as part of an extraction of an erupted tooth.

The clinical record should describe the circumstances, rather than stating “surgical extraction performed.”

“Surgical extraction performed” does not inform the payer what elements of the service led to a conclusion that D7140 was not reported.

A more adequate clinical record would describe where the surgical removal of bone was necessary and performed.

Tooth sectioning

Sectioning is another way to perform D7210. This occurs when a tooth must be separated into sections in order for it to be removed.

One example is when a provider must remove a multi-rooted tooth and must section off each root prior to removal.

As mentioned previously, providing complete and precise documentation is essential. The record should document the extraction in detail and not just state that it was a “difficult extraction.”

Bone removal and sectioning together

Some cases involve both.

When they do, documenting both creates a much clearer clinical picture for anyone reviewing the record later.

Interpreting flap elevation requires specific knowledge

In certain extraction cases, the dentist may need to create a mucoperiosteal flap to access the surgical site. The flap is generally replaced once the extraction is completed. Flap elevation does not necessarily justify coding for D7210. Documentation should indicate the qualifying work, i.e. the removal of the bony tissue or the sectioning of the tooth. Flap elevation alone should not justify coding for the extraction. With coding experience, Medical Billing and Coding Services can analyze a case and determine if the work described in the documentation supports the code that was assigned. Coding should always be based on the work described in the documentation, and before assigning a code, the operative note should always be reviewed in their entirety.

D7140 vs D7210 vs D7220: The Difference That Matters

The easiest way to approach extraction coding is to start with tooth status and then look at the work performed.

Coding Factor D7140 D7210 D7220
Tooth status Erupted tooth or exposed root Erupted tooth Impacted tooth
Basic concept Elevation and/or forceps removal Requires bone removal and/or tooth sectioning Soft-tissue impaction
Bone removal defining the service No May be the qualifying work Not the defining feature
Tooth sectioning Not the defining service May qualify the extraction Depends on clinical procedure
Flap Not what defines D7140 Included if indicated Required for access to soft-tissue impacted tooth
Main coding question Was routine erupted-tooth extraction performed? Did the erupted tooth require bone removal or sectioning? Is the tooth impacted beneath soft tissue?

ADA guidance distinguishes D7140 and D7210 based on the clinical work performed, while D7220 and the other impaction codes describe different presentations of impacted teeth. 

D7140 is not just an easy code to use

This code describes the extraction of an erupted tooth or an exposed root, through elevation and/or removal with forceps.

Extraction of a tooth or root may require some cases to be frustrating and/or time consuming. Even if the case is time consuming, it may fall under D7140 if the work documented does not meet the description of D7210.

Missouri’s Medicaid program states that place of service is not defining factor of surgical extraction. The determination is based upon the methodology of tooth removal.

This means that a tooth may be removed via a surgical method in a setting that is not considered a traditional operating room.

D7210 is not an impacted-tooth code

This distinction is often times lumped together in online resources.

As per D7210, the code is to be used for an “erupted” tooth.

On the other hand, “Impacted” teeth, as per their clinical presentations, are provided with separate codes.

Related Extraction Codes That Billing Teams Should Recognize

You don’t need to memorize every oral surgery code to process one D7210 claim, but you do need enough context to catch an obvious mismatch.

D7220: Soft-tissue impacted tooth

This code describes the surgical procedure for the removal of an impacted tooth in which soft tissue covers the occlusal surface. This requires an incision to elevate a flap to uncover the impacted tooth.

D7230: Partially bony impacted tooth

D7230 is utilized in cases of bony impaction of a portion of the crown. This involves the removal of a covering of bone and may require the elevation of a flap.

D7240: Completely bony impacted tooth

Impactions meeting the case description in the article can be coded to D7240.

D7210 and D7240 are not to be interchangeable.

D7210 describes an impacted tooth that can be entirely enclosed by overlying hard or soft tissue. However, D7240 is describing a fully bony impaction of a tooth that is not completely represented by hard or soft tissues.

D7241: Completely bony with unusual surgical complications

This code identifies a bony impaction that required surgical intervention. In addition, there were a number of complications during the procedure that are not described in the current code.

The billing team should not attempt to determine the reason for the visit based on the assumption that complicated procedures take longer.

D7250: Residual tooth roots

Residual roots are left behind after the extraction of an adult tooth and are considered a code in their own right.

The American Dental Association (ADA) explains the extraction of adult teeth in Codes D7140, D7210 and D7250 and states that the decision as to which code to assign is contingent on the circumstances of the case.

If the case record indicates that a residual root was removed rather than an adult tooth, then D7250 may be assigned rather than D7210.

In all other situations, D7210 is the most appropriate code assignment.

A Simple Code-Selection Workflow

When you’re reviewing an extraction claim, don’t start by asking whether the procedure was “surgical.”

Start here:

Step 1: Identify the tooth status

Was it:

  • Erupted?
  • Impacted?
  • A residual root?

This immediately narrows the relevant code family.

Step 2: Read what was actually done

For an erupted tooth, look for:

  • Elevation/forceps removal
  • Bone removal
  • Tooth sectioning

Step 3: Match the procedure to the CDT description

Don’t reverse-engineer the documentation to justify the code already selected.

The chart should drive the claim.

Step 4: Check the supporting records

Confirm that the:

  • Tooth number matches
  • Radiograph corresponds to the tooth
  • Narrative agrees with the operative note
  • Claim doesn’t contradict the chart

Step 5: Verify payer-specific requirements

The Codes and Descriptors of Services (CDT) provide uniformity in defining and identifying health care services. The CDT includes a description of the service provided, but does not warrant or guarantee payment for the service.

The rules for coverage and payment may vary by plan and may be affected by such things as prior authorization, utilization management, medical necessity, level of benefits and limits.

Documentation That Makes D7210 Defensible

Tracing records can challenge even the most meritorious case.

A well-written operative note prepares the case record for evaluation by an uninvolved reviewing clinician or payer.

1. Identification of Tooth

The record must note the correct tooth and do so in a clear and unambiguous manner.

Documentation of the correct tooth is of special importance when the claim and radiograph are to be compared with the operative note.

2. Indication for Extraction

It is important that the reason for the extraction be based upon the patient’s condition and not on the clinician’s assumption of an existing diagnosis.

3. Eruption

If a tooth is to be extracted and the condition of the tooth is such that it is un-erupted, D7210 would not be valid. In such cases the record should explain the nature of the condition.

4. Removal of Bone

If removal of bone is the basis for the code, state the reason for removing the bone, and indicate the area of the bone that was removed.

How the Bone Removal Facilitated Extraction

The level of detail in the documentation of the procedure performed should align with the practice’s Documentation standards.

5. Tooth Sectioning

If sectioning justifies the code, the description should include that the tooth was sectioned, and if pertinent to the case, the rationale for doing so.

The description should not exceed what is required to explain the service performed.

6. Flap Reflection

In the case that a flap has been reflected, that should be captured in the description of service performed.

Keep in mind that reflection of a flap does not justify the code for extraction of an erupted tooth (D7210).

7. Documentation of Service Completion and Closure

It should be documented if:

  • Portions of the tooth were removed
  • The socket was evaluated
  • The socket was irrigated
  • Bleeding was controlled
  • The socket was closed
  • Sutures were placed
  • Patient instruction were provided

Minor adjustment to the socket to attain the smooth contour of the alveolar ridge and closure of the extraction site is captured in the code definition.

X-Rays and Supporting Images

Not all payers apply the same rules for attaching supporting documents to claims.

Check the patient’s plan to see if there is a requirement for radiographs.

In general, supporting radiographs are routinely required for oral surgery claims.

For instance, Delta Dental requires a current periapical or panoramic radiograph for claims for codes D7210-D7241, and related codes, to document the position of the tooth and surrounding bone. They also require a legible and comprehensive tooth chart with notations, and if available, photographs.

Match the image to the narrative

An X-ray can be ineffective for multiple reasons, such as:

  • It does not show the correct tooth
  • It was taken at the wrong time, or is otherwise not relevant to the current clinical situation
  • The claimed tooth number does not agree with the record
  • The narrative describes a structure that is not present on the record

When considering a submission as a whole, there are multiple components that contribute to a single collective piece of evidence.

The claim, the narrative, the radiograph and the clinical record must all agree and support the same conclusion to be effective.

A Better D7210 Narrative

There is no single story that will guarantee reimbursement.

This is a good thing. This allows storytellers to put as much or as little detail as they see fit to accurately describe the procedure.

This prevents writers from crafting a story that is little more than an incomplete description of a payment code.

Weak narrative

Surgical extraction performed. Difficult extraction.

The reason for the extraction is not documented.

Nothing provides the reviewer what made the service consistent with D7210.

Stronger structure

useful narratives include:

  • Permanent tooth number
  • Clinical condition requiring treatment
  • Eruption status
  • Bone removal and/or sectioning
  • Indication for additional surgery
  • Related supporting documents

An example of an adequate narrative would be:

#30 was an erupted permanent tooth which could not be delivered (moved into the correct position in the arch) and removed with an elevating instrument. The buccal bone was removed to provide access for surgical removal and the tooth was sectioned. (cut in half) See pre-op radiograph and operative report.

The example is intended to assist in the understanding of an adequate narrative and is not to be used literally. The documentation of the clinical record must be determined by the licenced clinical professional.

Common D7210 Billing Mistakes

Coding from appointment difficulty

The description for a CDT code typically does not contain the term “difficult extraction”.

An extraction that takes 45 minutes does not mean the code selection should be D7210. The opposite also applies. A code selection should not be D7140 based on extraction time alone.

Time is just one of several factors that must be considered for code selection. The Clinical judgment of the physician ultimately determines the code selection.

Treating all flaps as D7210 is a frequently used Rule-Out

Where the operative note says only that a flap was raised, additional information may be documented in other areas of the operative report that defines the surgical procedure in more detail.

However, payer policies may stipulate that the entire flap not be elevated and that sectioning of the tooth or removal of the bone be performed instead.

Using D7210 for impacted teeth

D7210 states that the case is an erupted tooth.

D7220-D7241 provides codes for impacted teeth. In the case of an impacted tooth, the tooth should be coded to the most specific code from D7220-D7241 based on the description in the case record rather than to D7210.

Using D7210 because reimbursement is higher

Never select a procedure code based on which code pays more.

ADA’s coding guidance emphasizes using the full nomenclature and descriptor and coding for the procedure actually performed. 

Confusing minor socket smoothing with qualifying bone removal

Some practices perform minor smoothing of the socket bone during extractions, and both D7140 and D7210 codes contain language alluding to this possibility. As such, the absence of bone removal should not be used to distinguish between the two codes. The difference should be based on the work performed during the extraction and documented by the clinician. This is important for practices using Dental Billing Services, as the billing staff may, when reviewing clinical notes, misunderstand socket bone smoothing to be the removal of bone (D7210).

Why D7210 Claims Get Denied or Downcoded

Denials don’t always mean the procedure wasn’t performed. Sometimes the submitted record simply doesn’t establish it clearly enough.

Missing qualifying surgical work

The note, “Tooth #19 surgically extracted,” could be interpreted as extraction by surgery to remove the tooth. However, it could also signify that bone was removed or sectioned.

Documentation supports D7140 instead

If the operative note describes elevation and forceps removal but doesn’t document D7210-level work, a payer may process the service differently.

Tooth status conflicts with the code

If documentation shows an impacted tooth but the claim reports D7210, the code may not match the clinical situation.

Missing radiograph

Some payers request supporting imaging for oral surgery claims.

Submitting required documentation upfront can prevent avoidable requests for additional information.

Tooth-number mismatch

There are 2 main issues associated with claims for #18 accompanied by supporting documentation for #19. The first, and probably most significant, is the effect such claims and documentation have on the overall credibility of the provider submitting the claims. The second is the burden such claims place on the overall processes and resources of the Medicare contractor.

Benefit limitation or plan exclusion

Correct coding does not ensure that a service is covered.

There are many reasons that a service may be covered and coded accurately, including:

  • It may apply to the member’s deductible.
  • It may be subject to limits of the member’s health plan.
  • It may require predetermination.
  • It may be an service that, when provided, would cause the member to exhaust their annual dollar limit.
  • It may be a service that is not covered by the member’s health plan.

Distinguish coverage determination from coding accuracy.

Practical Scenario: D7140 or D7210?

Consider a mandibular molar that erupted and is planned for extraction.

Scenario A

The dentist used an elevator and forceps to remove the molar. The dentist smoothed the socket and closed the flap.

Removing the molar requires more time than other extractions, but the molar removal is described as smoothing the socket and closing the flap. Therefore, the description better aligns with D7140.

Scenario B

The erupted molar is again in a different location and cannot be removed routinely. The dentist removed bone to help gain access to the molar to remove it in pieces.

Removing the molar in this location describes and supports the differences needed to justify D7210.

Scenario C

The molar is entirely covered and fused with the surrounding bone.

Do not think about D7210.

Here, we are talking about an impacted tooth, and an impacted tooth family of codes is warranted.

The status of the tooth justifies the code selection.

Worked Claim Example Without Inventing Reimbursement

Let’s say tooth #30 has a D7210 performed on it.

The components of the dental claim will include:

  • The patient and subscriber identification.
  • The tooth number.
  • The code D7210.
  • The date the service was provided.
  • The amount the practice billed.
  • The code(s) and/or diagnosis(es) related to the reason the D7210 extraction was provided.
  • Any x-rays required by the payer.
  • A surgical report/narrative regarding the surgical extraction.

Now let’s say the dental claim is processed by the payer.

The amount paid by the payer will depend on the following:

  • The amount in the payer’s fee schedule.
  • The patient’s deductible.
  • The patient’s coinsurance.
  • The patient’s out of pocket maximum.
  • Exclusions in the plan.
  • Coordination of benefits.
  • Payer edits and adjustment policies.
  • The amount paid by the plan for D7210 codes is not standard.

In articles focused on coding, it is inaccurate and misleading to provide a made up national dollar amount to practices.

Before billing, practices should verify the payer’s fee schedule and the patient’s out of pocket responsibility and benefits.

Insurance Verification Before the Extraction

Proper billing begins with the verification of the member’s benefits.

Prior to any surgical procedure, verify the following:

  • What oral surgery benefits, if any, are provided?
  • What is the member’s deductible?
  • What is the member’s coinsurance?
  • What is the member’s oral surgery benefit annual maximum?
  • If applicable, what is the member’s oral surgery benefit waiting period?
  • Are predetermination requests (s) required?
  • What (if any) documents are required to support the request?
  • Is the member’s oral surgeon in network?
  • Is a Coordination of Benefits (COB) required?

It should be noted that just because a benefit category covers extraction service (D7210), it does not mean the member’s insurance will cover the service.

Merely determining eligibility of a member does not imply the member will receive payment for the service.

A more accurate estimation of liability should be based upon the insurance benefit rather than an assumption by the billing office staff.

Dental vs Medical Billing for Surgical Extractions

Because there isn’t a uniform policy for every plan, this area requires a more individualized review.

In the case of the majority of extraction claims, dental benefits are the appropriate benefit to submit the claim under, with dental extraction codes from the CDT. However, there are exceptions to this, and oral surgical procedures may be medically necessary and impact the member’s medical plan based on the following:

  • The member’s medical plan
  • The reason for the treatment
  • The member’s accident/injury
  • The member’s condition
  • The requirement for case coordination
  • How the dental plan addresses oral surgery

In some cases, a dental plan would require a medical determination for certain procedures.

There is no hard and fast rule for when to look to medical benefits first, but in most cases, it is appropriate to seek payment from dental benefits first.

When medical coverage might need review

Situations governed by any of the following may warrant exceptions:

  • Trauma
  • Certain oral surgery related to medically necessary conditions
  • Treatment in a hospital or other healthcare facility
  • Certain forms of plan coordination

The details of these exceptions may vary considerably.

Determine which plan you should following based on your situation. Then reach out to that plan for additional assistance.

D7210 and Alveoloplasty

Extraction and alveoloplasty are two services that are often combined. As such, extraction and alveoloplasty should not be considered separately payable services.

There are instances where the service describes bone removal in addition to smoothing of the bone in the socket.

If additional alveoloplasty is performed and does not meet the description in the relevant alveoloplasty code, it is important to determine if the payer considers the service separately payable.

Bone needs to be smoothed during an extraction to remove it. Smooth bone does not justify reporting an additional code.

It is the responsibility of the provider to demonstrate that a distinct service was performed if a separate code is reported.

Services Commonly Included in the Extraction

The ADA’s CDT code manual considers tooth extractions to include local anesthesia, suturing if necessary, and routine post-op care.

Therefore, it is unlikely that components of a routine tooth extraction would be reported as a separate procedure.

For D7210, related activities may include:

  • Removal of tooth structure
  • Related gingival/bone curtantal incisions
  • Minor smoothing of extraction socket
  • Closure

Other activities reported in the operative note do not necessarily warrant an additional procedure code.

D7210 Billing Checklist

Before submitting the claim, run through this short checklist:

Clinical

  • Tooth is correctly identified.
  • Tooth status is documented as erupted.
  • Reason for extraction is documented.
  • Bone removal and/or tooth sectioning is clearly recorded.
  • Flap information is included when applicable.
  • Closure and clinically relevant postoperative details are documented.

Claim

  • D7210 matches the operative note.
  • Tooth number matches all records.
  • Required radiograph is attached.
  • Narrative is included when required or helpful.
  • Payer-specific documentation requirements were checked.
  • Predetermination/authorization requirements were reviewed.

Benefits

  • Eligibility was verified.
  • Deductible was checked.
  • Coinsurance was checked.
  • Annual maximum was reviewed.
  • Coordination of benefits was checked when applicable.
  • Patient estimate was presented as an estimate, not a guarantee.

Handling a D7210 Downcode or Denial

Don’t immediately resubmit the exact same claim.

First determine why it was processed that way.

Review the EOB

Identify whether the issue concerns:

  • Coding
  • Documentation
  • Missing attachment
  • Coverage
  • Authorization
  • Benefit limitation
  • Duplicate submission

Compare the operative note with D7210

Do records indicate removal or sectioning of bone or tooth?

Identify and explain this information if it is included in the record.

If it is not in the record, do not make up information to support payment.

The record should not be altered.

Check submitted attachments

Make sure the payer received the:

  • Correct radiograph
  • Correct tooth-specific documentation
  • Narrative
  • Any payer-required records

Appeal when the record supports it

If the documentation justifies D7210 and the payer permits additional consideration in its appeal process, then an appeal should be filed with the relevant documentation.

The appeals process is limited. Make your points quickly and directly.

It is usually helpful to provide a description of the situation to the payer; lengthy, unrelated discussion of the case is generally not helpful.

Building Better Operative Note Templates

Templates are good to use, but can be bad if designed poorly. For example, a template that provides a default value of “Flap elevated, bone removed, tooth sectioned” creates an incorrect record if that actually did not happen.

A better approach is to have the provider enter or select the following information:

  • Tooth Number
  • Eruption Status
  • Extraction Reason
  • Type of Anesthesia
  • Extraction Method
  • Bone removal and sectioning
  • Complications
  • Closure
  • Post Op Instructions

Finally, the template must be designed to capture variability in the type of flap used, sectioning, and complications. The template must facilitate the provider in capturing the true essence of the case. The case facts and details must not be pre-populated.

Quick Decision Guide for the Front Desk and Billing Team

When the provider selects D7210, ask:

Was the tooth erupted?

If no, review the impacted/residual-root code family.

If yes, continue.

Does the note document bone removal or tooth sectioning?

If yes, D7210 may be supported.

If no, review whether D7140 better reflects the documented service.

Do the claim, tooth number, note, and image agree?

If no, correct the inconsistency before submission.

Does this payer require supporting documentation?

If yes, attach it before the claim leaves the office.

This simple review catches many avoidable problems.

Accuracy Matters More Than Choosing the Higher Code

It’s important to not to type D7210 as the better-paying alternative to D7140.

There are a variety of reasons for this. For example, stating “there was a left foot lesion and provider attempted to resect but was unable to fully do so,” is considerably different from “there was a left foot lesion and provider resected it completely.” Reporting these facts in a manner similar to how the provider has documented them is critical. If the documentation by the provider is clear and the billing team captures and interprets that documentation in the same manner as the provider, the claim denial discussions become very infrequent.

It is ideal to use full descriptors and be as specific as possible when using ICD-10 codes. The American Dental Association has stated that if a provider captures a complete resection, the full code descriptor and nomenclature should be used.

From a business standpoint, this means less speculation and more accurate documentations.

FAQs About D7210 Dental Code

What is the D7210 dental code?

D7210 is a CDT code for extraction of an erupted tooth when removal requires bone removal, tooth sectioning, or both. Elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap is included when indicated. The code should reflect the procedure actually performed, not simply the difficulty or duration of the extraction. 

What is the difference between D7140 and D7210?

D7140 generally applies to removal of an erupted tooth or exposed root by elevation and/or forceps. D7210 applies when an erupted tooth requires bone removal and/or tooth sectioning. Both descriptions can include minor socket-bone smoothing and closure, so those routine steps alone don’t establish D7210. 

Does raising a flap automatically qualify for D7210?

No. Flap elevation alone should not automatically trigger D7210. The code centers on an erupted tooth requiring bone removal and/or tooth sectioning, with flap elevation included when indicated. Some payer guidance explicitly states that flap elevation without bone removal or sectioning isn’t sufficient for D7210. 

Can D7210 be used for an impacted wisdom tooth?

D7210 describes an erupted tooth. Impacted teeth are reported using separate codes such as D7220, D7230, D7240, or D7241 depending on the clinical presentation. Review the tooth’s eruption/impaction status and current CDT description rather than selecting D7210 solely because the extraction was difficult. 

What documentation should support D7210?

The record should identify the tooth, clinical reason for extraction, erupted status, and qualifying surgical work such as bone removal or sectioning. Payer requirements vary, but current radiographs, detailed tooth-specific chart notes, and available photographs may be requested for oral surgery claims.

Does insurance always cover D7210?

No. Correct coding doesn’t guarantee coverage. Payment depends on the patient’s benefit plan, network status, deductible, coinsurance, annual maximum, limitations, authorization requirements, and other payer rules. Verify current benefits and payer requirements before treatment and avoid presenting an estimate as guaranteed reimbursement.

Sources

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get in Touch

One More Step To Continue

Get Free Consultaion

EXCELLENT
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Based on 15 reviews
Posted on Google Google
Bonnie Russo profile picture
Bonnie Russo
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Resilient Medical Billing Services has been our absolute saving grace—true knights in shining armor! We came from a well-known billing company that left us drowning—five months in and still no credentialing completed, we were overwhelmed, losing money, and even paying money back. It was a nightmare. Then we found Resilient. From day one, their team took charge with professionalism, clarity, and genuine care. They not only cleaned up the mess we were left with, but completed all our new credentialing in record time. Their communication is phenomenal—they’re responsive, proactive, and always available when we need them. Since working with Resilient, we’ve seen a real shift—not just in profit, but in peace of mind. We feel seen, heard, and fully supported. Choosing them has been one of the best decisions we’ve made for our business. Highly, highly recommend! Bonnie Russo, LCSW Owner/Operator Papillon Health and Wellness Psychotherapy
Posted on Google Google
Jartu Garway profile picture
Jartu Garway
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can’t recommend Resilient Medical Billing Services enough! They truly made the process of getting credentialed with Medicaid and some of the top insurance companies in the state fast and smooth. From start to finish, they stayed on top of everything, ensuring there were no delays. Their communication was consistent, keeping me informed throughout the entire process. What sets them apart is their dedication to seeing you succeed. They are incredibly respectful, patient, and thorough when requesting information, always double-checking to ensure everything is correct and in place for approval. Their attention to detail helped eliminate any potential roadblocks during the credentialing process. Another major plus is their pricing structure- there's a one-time charge with no hidden fees,and they do exactly what they say. No Surprises, no fine print,Just reliable Services. I will be recommending them for the rest of my career—this team knows how to get the job done right and efficiently! MIKE WOOD IS THE BEST I HONESTLY FEEL LIKE HE IS FAMILY INSTEAD OF A BUSINESS AFFILIATION!!!!
Posted on Google Google
lashelle melton profile picture
lashelle melton
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Positive Review for Resilient Credentialing and Billing Company I am thrilled to share my experience with Resilient Credentialing and Billing Company, having partnered with them since May 2024 for Melton Telepsychiatry Services. From the very beginning, their professionalism and dedication to our clinic's needs have been evident. The team at Resilient has made the credentialing process seamless and efficient. They possess a deep understanding of the nuances in our industry, which has significantly alleviated the stress typically associated with credentialing and billing. Their prompt communication and willingness to address any questions have provided us with peace of mind, allowing us to focus more on our patients. Additionally, their billing services are exemplary. They have streamlined our billing processes, ensuring timely reimbursements and maintaining an accurate account of our services. This has had a positive impact on our cash flow and overall operational efficiency. Overall, I highly recommend Resilient for any clinic looking for reliable, knowledgeable, and supportive credentialing and billing services. Their commitment to client success truly sets them apart in the industry. Thank you, Resilient, for your outstanding service! Dr. LaShelle Melton DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, CCHP
Posted on Google Google
Bakary Marong profile picture
Bakary Marong
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Hello Mike Thank you for your credentialing service and I truly appreciate you especially your commitment, respect and professionalism you have shown me during the entire process. I will highly recommend you to anyone who is interested in credentialing services. Mike, it was truly amazing to work with you. Thank you for helping me get credentialed with both Medicare and private insurances. Bakary Marong
Posted on Google Google
Ivanka Acosta profile picture
Ivanka Acosta
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Resilient MBS is the best for all your medical billing service needs! Being a new business owner, I was looking for a company that could help me become in network with certain medical and vision plans. Not only did resilient MBS do that, but they also answered any questions I had about the process and what to expect. The credentialing specialist Mike was great. He was always quick to respond to my emails and would send me frequent updates. I truly recommend Resilient MBS.
Posted on Google Google
Cynthia Madueke profile picture
Cynthia Madueke
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have had a highly positive experience working with the team, particularly Mike. They have provided clear and helpful guidance throughout the credentialing process, addressing all my questions and concerns. I am also looking forward to continuing our collaboration on billing services. The team's expertise and support have been invaluable, and I appreciate their dedication to ensuring a smooth and successful experience.
Posted on Google Google
Kristin Tomczak profile picture
Kristin Tomczak
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with Mike Wood through Resilient BBS LLC is making the credentialing process as smooth as possible! Mike has been communicative about the process each step of the way and is readily available whenever I have a question and/or need clarification.
Posted on Google Google
ReklayMe Health and Wellness profile picture
ReklayMe Health and Wellness
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
They have been very helpful and very patient throughout my credentialing process. It is a great company to work with!
Verified by Trustindex
Trustindex verified badge is the Universal Symbol of Trust. Only the greatest companies can get the verified badge who has a review score above 4.5, based on customer reviews over the past 12 months. Read more

One More Step To View Pricing